Loading your observing data…
A starting point — adjust weights to fit your class before assigning.
| Category | Weight | Exemplary | Proficient | Developing | Incomplete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redshift, Velocity & Distance | 25 pts | Correct z, recession velocity, and distance (in Mpc and millions of light-years), with every step and formula shown. | Method correct; one arithmetic slip or a missing unit. | A formula misused or a step skipped, leading to a wrong distance. | Calculation missing. |
| Rotation-Curve Analysis | 25 pts | Correctly describes the curve, calculates the expected outer speed from visible matter, and finds the mass ratio and dark-matter share — on an annotated graph. | Analysis mostly correct; graph annotations thin or one value off. | Describes the curve but doesn't quantify the missing mass. | No rotation-curve analysis. |
| Dark Matter Argument | 25 pts | A clear claim backed by the student's own numbers plus at least two independent lines of evidence, explained in their own words. | Solid claim and data; outside evidence mentioned but not explained. | Asserts dark matter without connecting it to the data. | No argument. |
| Alternatives & Assumptions | 15 pts | Takes on a real alternative (e.g. hidden ordinary matter, measurement error, modified gravity) and explains why the evidence favors dark matter; states at least one assumption made. | Names an alternative with thin reasoning. | No real alternative or assumption discussed. | Missing. |
| Communication | 10 pts | Organized like a real analysis report: clear sections, labeled graph, correct units. | Mostly clear with minor gaps. | Hard to follow. | Not submitted. |
🔭 Problem 5.3.1 · Unit 5 of 6 · Single Semester