One of these two, plus the written scale explanation either way.
Small objects for planets, paced out at real scaled distances outdoors. Honest by construction — the distances can't be faked.
A spreadsheet or drawn diagram with every size and distance calculated from one clearly labeled scale factor.
Every item below has to show up somewhere in your model or write-up — check them off as you go.
A starting point — adjust weights to fit your class before assigning.
| Category | Weight | Exemplary | Proficient | Developing | Incomplete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale Accuracy | 35 pts | A single, consistent scale factor is correctly applied to every size AND every distance, for all 8 planets and the Sun. | Scale is mostly consistent; one or two values are off or miscalculated. | Sizes and distances use different, unrelated scales (the exact mistake this project targets). | No real scale calculation shown. |
| Completeness | 20 pts | The Sun and all eight planets are included, correctly ordered and positioned. | Missing one body or one minor ordering issue. | Missing several bodies. | Model is largely incomplete. |
| Write-Up Quality | 25 pts | Clearly states the chosen scale factor, shows at least one worked calculation, and honestly explains any compromises made. | States the scale and mostly explains the math; light on detail in one area. | Scale is mentioned but not actually explained or justified. | No write-up submitted. |
| Craftsmanship & Presentation | 20 pts | Clean, clear execution — physical model is sturdy and labeled, or digital model is well-organized and easy to read. | Mostly clear with minor presentation issues. | Hard to follow or noticeably rough. | Not submitted. |
🔭 Project 3.2.3 · Unit 3 of 6 · Single Semester