Network attacks exploit the trust built into core protocols — ARP, DNS, Ethernet switching — that were never designed with an adversary in mind.
Beyond the named attacks above, several structural weaknesses make networks vulnerable in the first place:
| Weakness | What it enables |
|---|---|
| Missing or misconfigured firewalls | Malicious traffic can flood the network, map its structure, or spoof a device |
| Compromised device on the LAN | Adversary leverages existing access to compromise other devices nearby |
| Open, unsecured data ports | Physically plugging in grants LAN access, enabling DoS or MAC attacks |
| Unsecured wireless signals | Adversaries outside the building can eavesdrop or attack the wireless network |
| No device/user authentication | Adversaries can join the network directly to attack from within |
| Open network port | A rogue access point plugged in bypasses firewalls entirely |
You met these back in Unit 1 as a discussion topic. Now, with real packet captures in front of you, they're a lot less abstract — a script kiddie running a downloaded ARP-spoofing tool leaves very different traces than a transnational criminal organization running a coordinated DDoS.
This six-phase model (aligned with the industry-standard MITRE ATT&CK framework) is the same one from Unit 1 — but a Wireshark capture is exactly the kind of evidence that lets you place a real event into one of these phases.
A baseline is simply a recorded picture of what normal traffic looks like on a given network — which protocols show up, roughly how often, and from which devices. Without a baseline, "unusual" has no reference point.
A captured baseline shows one ARP reply per device roughly every few minutes, consistent with normal network housekeeping. Later in the same capture, you see this: 14:02:03 ARP reply: 192.168.1.1 is-at AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:01 14:02:04 ARP reply: 192.168.1.1 is-at AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:99 14:02:04 ARP reply: 192.168.1.1 is-at AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:99 14:02:05 ARP reply: 192.168.1.1 is-at AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:99