The Full Malware Vocabulary and Three Real Attacks

4.1.BMalware

Completing the Malware Vocabulary

Back in 1.2.1, five malware types were enough โ€” virus, worm, trojan horse, backdoor, spyware. These five finish the AP-tested list, and several are considerably more dangerous:

๐Ÿฆ  Five More Malware Types โ€” click each one
Encrypts a device's files, then demands payment โ€” usually with a deadline โ€” for the decryption key. Directly attacks availability: the data still exists, but the owner can't reach it.
โš ๏ธRansomware and rootkits deserve extra attention. Ransomware is the malware type most likely to make headlines โ€” it directly attacks availability, and its business-model design (a deadline, a payment demand) is distinct from every other type on this list. Rootkits are dangerous specifically because they can render standard detection tools blind โ€” a rootkit can hide itself, other malware, and even alter what the operating system reports back to security software.
4.1.CConcept

How Adversaries Exploit Devices โ€” Beyond Malware

Malware is one tool among several. Adversaries also exploit structural weaknesses in how a device is set up:

WeaknessWhat it enables
Unpatched softwareKnown, documented exploits can crash a system, spy on the user, or seize control
Weak authenticationPassword guessing or social engineering to obtain valid credentials directly
No BIOS/UEFI passwordBooting into a special mode grants high-level privileges, including changing user passwords
Autorun enabledMalware on an external drive runs automatically the moment it's inserted
Open portsA direct connection point an adversary can use to reach the device
No/misconfigured firewallMalicious data reaches the device unfiltered, disrupting or seizing control of it
๐Ÿ’กEvery single one of these traces back to a control you've already learned: patching (1.2.3), authentication hygiene (1.1.2), and firewalls (1.2.1). This section isn't new defense โ€” it's the adversary's-eye view of why those defenses exist in the first place.
Case Study

Three Attacks That Actually Happened

These three appear constantly as multiple-choice context clues โ€” not because they're the most technically complex attacks in history, but because they're clean, well-documented examples of exactly the mechanisms you just studied.

๐Ÿ“š Three Attacks That Actually Happened
2000ยทEmail worm
Spread as a VBS attachment disguised as a love letter. Once opened, it overwrote files and emailed itself to everyone in the victim's Outlook contacts โ€” spreading purely through social engineering and trust in a familiar sender, with no need to exploit a technical vulnerability to propagate.
๐Ÿ”‘Notice the pattern across all three: ILOVEYOU exploited human trust, Stuxnet exploited multiple unknown (zero-day) vulnerabilities, and WannaCry exploited a known, already-patchable vulnerability. The most preventable of the three caused some of the most widespread global disruption โ€” patching really is that consequential.
โ† Back to Activity 2.2.1Next: Activity 2.2.2 โ†’Server Vulnerabilities.